What, then, of the purely instrumental music?
That horsehair strings were used for accompanying the voice
tells us nothing about the harps of the instrumentalists and
of the bulk of the Robert ap Huw manuscript. It has sometimes
been assumed by modern writers that if horsehair strings were
used for accompaniment they must have been used for truly instrumental
music as well, but these were entirely separate fields. The
instrumentalists were the highly respected music specialists,
the gwyr wrth gerdd dant or tantorion, drawn from
the aristocracy or the professional class, quite unlike the
vocalists, the datgeiniaid or clerwyr, who were
drawn from the servant class, or perhaps sometimes from the
ranks of young trainee poets. It is vital to understand
this, that there was not just one category here: 'players of
the harp'; but two entirely separate categories, with almost
nothing in common with each other.
For instance, an instrumentalist would always
solicit his reward directly from a patron, whereas a vocalist
would normally receive his via the instrumentalist or the
poet he acted as servant to. The complexity of the system is
shown by a fascinating provision in one version of the Welsh
legal code, in translation: "Every pencerdd telyn (every
head of music of the harp - probably) is to have 24 pence
from the cerddorion (musicians) who have left off the
telyn rawn (the horsehair-strung lyre here, probably,
not the harp) and who wish to become recognised musicians
and suitors". This is to say that on graduating - we cannot
be certain from exactly what to what - a musician had to
pay a sum to the pencerdd. Most probably, the payment
was compensation for the pencerdd no longer deriving
income from the musician's performances, but it may have been
an indenture payment on the pencerdd taking on the musician
as a student in the first place, if instrumentalists were commonly
recruited from the ranks of the vocalists. Either way, here
we definitely have a progression by musicians,
from using the horsehair lyre or harp, into a more mature business
framework. But whatever it was that the musician became
here, it certainly did not involve a horsehair instrument.
With the confusion over what the horsehair-stringed
instruments were used for cleared up, we are brought back to
the concept of the metal strings implied by Gerald and by the
poems. We can focus in closer on the exact nature of the instrumentalists' harps
by looking at the music of the Robert ap Huw Manuscript itself,
along with all the other technical evidence on cerdd
dant.
The first thing that immediately strikes the
ear as you become familiar with the richness of the harmony
of this music and its attention to minute detail is that, given
a choice, no-one would ever have chosen to play such music
on gut or horsehair strings if metal strings were available.
Or, looking at it another way, music like this would never have
evolved on gut or horsehair strings. The music simply needs
the sustain and clarity of metal strings, else its most precious
and distinctive assets are virtually thrown away. I shall come
back to these vital points later.
There are other practical factors that come
into play here. As all modern harpists know, constant damping
in the treble is simply unnecessary on gut strings. The same
is true of horsehair. You can detect damping on gut strings,
but the effect is so slight that a culture would never trouble
itself to evolve any system of damping as extensive as the cerdd
dant one for either gut or horsehair. That is why it is
only for metal-strung harps that we have records of damping,
and the same will be true here - for this most supremely
efficient, mature system of damping.
On a properly tensioned metal-strung harp,
harmony this complex simply has to be controlled by damping.
This explains why the contemporary explanations of the technicalities
of the music focus particularly on how the entire system of
harmony depends upon the need to control the chords created,
to create a clean sound when required, and why the ms. text
provides all the details of when and how this was done in practice.
And then there is the use of the fingernails
here, to pluck the strings. There are ways of using nails on
gut, but this particular nail technique frays them to destruction
very quickly indeed. Through the early 1970s, before I built
my cerdd dant harp with its 25 metal strings, I had
to use a gut-strung harp, so I can personally vouch for the
simple impossibility of this kind of nail attack ever having
been used on gut strings. You can do it, but it is not viable. Horsehair
strings are a different matter - they are strangely impervious
to wear from the nails. But on all strings except metal
ones, this nail technique, when combined with this damping technique,
has a devastating impact on the natural sonority of harps. These
techniques only serve to accentuate the relative thinness and
rapid decay of the sound of any strings which are not metal.
So this type of music, and most of these actual pieces,
will have grown up on the metal-strung harp (along with its
sister instruments of sustain - the crwth with its bowed
sustain, and the metal-strung timpan) just as Gerald described.
None of these pieces could ever have been played on gut strings
(without abandoning the nail technique indicated in the
ms., that is). This does not preclude the use of horsehair strings
for any pieces that may have been used for accompaniment
(as indeed some pieces probably were), since a nail-and-damping
technique, once evolved on metal, does not take much trouble
to transfer to horsehair. But essentially, the aristocratic
solo harp in Wales will have been very similar to its counterparts
in Ireland and Scotland and will have been metal-strung. For
the technical details we need to look to the poetry, to the
tablature and to later designs of metal-strung harp of which
we have surviving examples.
Amongst the poems which writers on early music
in Wales have overlooked is an important one composed c.
1495 by Owain ap Llywelyn ab y Moel. It uses the stringing
of the harp to illustrate the value of bringing together two
complementary factors. Two different materials are indicated:
an unnamed material - no doubt bronze or brass - for the treble
and goldwir - gold wire - for the remainder. This is
an entirely credible combination. Ann Heymann, followed by other
harpists, has already been led by the physics of early metal-strung
harps to experiment with using mainly gold alloy strings in
the bass. They have found that the greater density of gold,
by enabling the lower strings to be thinner and more flexible,
produces a better sound than brass or bronze does there.
As regards its construction, the harp indicated by the tablature
was small - it had only 25 strings and so bore very much less
tension in total than the earliest extant metal-strung harps,
which have an extra 4 or more strings added at the lower end.
It follows that its design did not need to be as robust. In
particular, that most useful of markers for identifying representations
of metal-strung harps - the T-section thickening of the forepillar
- may well have been unnecessary. So I think there is a need
to reappraise early representations of what have been presumed
not to be metal-strung harps, especially in Wales and England,
since some of them might have been metal ones after all. A good
candidate is the Welsh carving at Dynevor, which has a pretty
robust construction quite unlike the 'baroque' type of frame
often encountered in that period.
page 3 of 5